Since the FCC announced just before Thanksgiving that it was planning to gut the rules, there have been about 750,000 calls to Congress made through Battle for the Net, a website run by groups that advocate for net neutrality. The discussion sprawled into the next day."The liberal organization MoveOn is urging Americans to speak up for net neutrality. Big-time Hollywood producer Shonda Rhimes tweeted a link to a story about saving net-neutrality on her lifestyle website."Access to a free and fair internet is necessary for a functioning democracy," said Lauren Gruber, a writer for a branding agency who joined the New York protest. One man was charged in November with threatening to kill US Rep.

By contrast, there were fewer than 30,000 calls in the first two weeks of November. FCC Chairman Ajit Pai and his staff have called out ugly and racist tweets and death threats. Having celebrities speak out can help spark people’s interest, she said.Critics of the rules say that they hurt investment in internet infrastructure and represent too much government involvement in business. More Hollywood celebrities have been joining the cry against the agency’s direction."Most people don’t follow what federal agencies like the FCC are doing, even though decisions can have a lot of impact on people’s lives, said Beth Leech, the political science professor at Rutgers University. Phone and cable companies say the rules aren’t necessary because they already support an open internet, and have lobbied hard for their repeal. They included questions about what net neutrality was, links to explanations and statements of support."Long live cute dog videos on YouTube! China wholesale Acrylic letter signsRIPinternet., a longtime net neutrality supporter, said on a call with reporters. "It’s the rarity that gives them some of their power..com, hundreds of thousands of comments came from one address in Russia and many comments were duplicates." Some Democrats are hoping that any rollback of net neutrality rules will become a campaign rallying cry in 2018 and beyond."There will be a political price to pay for those who are on the wrong side of this issue because net neutrality’s time as a campaign issue has arrived," Sen.Net-neutrality rules bar cable and phone companies from favouring certain websites and apps — such as their own services — and give the FCC more oversight over privacy and the activities of telecom companies. Share what you loved about The Internet," actor Mark Ruffalo tweeted as he urged people to push Congress to intervene.But the commenting system has been messy. While libertarian and conservative think tanks and telecom trade groups have spoken up against net neutrality, everyday people have been vocal in protesting the rules’ repeal.

John Katko and his family if the New York Republican didn’t support net neutrality. Now it’s hit the mainstream. If the net-neutrality rules are repealed, she said, "it’s just another showcase of oligarchy upon America."Net neutrality has the potential to motivate young and progressive voters to turn out," said Tyler Law, spokesman for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which works to get Democrats elected to the House.Celebrity complaints and street protests aren’t likely to stop the agency’s vote on Thursday, but activists hope the growing outcry will push Congress to intervene and will show support for stricter regulation down the road. Supporters worry that repealing them would hurt start-ups and other companies that couldn’t afford to pay a broadband company for faster access to customers. While Congress doesn’t need to approve FCC decisions, # it can overrule the agency by passing a law.Some net-neutrality supporters have become intensely personal in their advocacy. Next week, the Federal Communications Commission plans to vote on gutting Obama-era rules meant to stop broadband companies such as Comcast, AT&T and Verizon from exercising more control over what people watch and see on the internet.

The FCC’s commenting system has logged 23 million comments, compared with roughly 4 million for the last blockbuster issue — when the agency approved the net-neutrality rules in 2015."Protests that draw average people out into the streets across the country are relatively rare," she said. Pai also said activists came to his home to post signs that referenced his children.Net neutrality also has triggered discussions all over social media, even in groups that typically don’t discuss tech policy.Net neutrality is a simple concept but a dense and often technical issue normally discussed in tech and telecom circles.Meanwhile, net-neutrality supporters protested outside 700 Verizon stores Thursday, said Tim Karr, senior director of strategy for Free Press, an advocacy group involved in Battle for the Net. The FCC says millions of comments used temporary email accounts from fakemailgenerator. Democratic senators have called for a delay in next Thursday’s vote, while Democratic FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel urged backers to "make a ruckus. In midtown Manhattan, some 350 people came to chant slogans and wave signs. Republican campaign officials didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. An August study by a data firm backed by the telecom industry found that 60 percent of the comments made this year supported keeping the 2015 rules.Net neutrality has been a hot button before; thanks to assists from Silicon Valley and TV host John Oliver speaking out about what they see as threats to the internet. In one Facebook group about leggings seller LuLaRoe, one woman’s lament about the repeal triggered more than 270 responses. Ed Markey, D-Mass

Posted by: pretteroduc at 03:10 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 897 words, total size 6 kb.

"We feel that Lockwood must have had Rudyard stay here and write so we call it the ‘Kipling Bungalow’," explains Mishra, who wants the Maharashtra state government to restore it without delay. "The bungalow is in very bad condition and needs desperate help," the college’s principal, Rajiv Mishra, said.Heritage campaigners lament the demise of such buildings, blaming red tape and claiming politicians and developers are more concerned with constructing sparkly new luxury towers than preserving Mumbai’s architectural history. creating the death of a historic building," renowned architect Abha Narain Lambah, who specialises in conservation, said. (Photo: AFP)Hidden behind a blanket of trees at the back of a university in Mumbai lies the dilapidated, but once grand, former home of writer Rudyard Kipling.Maharashtra culture and education minister Vinod Tawde failed to respond to repeated requests for comment on the issue.

AFP contacted a number of officials at the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, regarding the Watson’s Hotel and the Harris building, but none were available for comment.The three-storey mansion, part of a public school, was out of use for three years until renovation began in June, and presently stands gutted, surrounded by bamboo scaffolding. School of Art in Mumbai.A short walk away, work has already begun on the former Mumbai residence of batsman and acclaimed cricket administrator George Harris, who was governor of the city from 1890-1895.The building has been caught in a tug-of-war between the college and the Illuminated sign Suppliers government for years over what its restoration should look like, but Mishra hopes renovations will finally start in around six months.He says officials plan to turn the building into a gallery exhibiting students’ work and that of decorated artists, and have issued a tender for the contract.The stately home hosted critical talks between Jinnah and India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru on partition of the subcontinent, but today its downtrodden appearance belies its historical significance.Today the crumbling structure houses a medley of dark cubby-hole offices.In arty Kala Ghoda district, a 147-year-old mansion, formerly the resplendent Watson’s Hotel, frequented and written about by Mark Twain, is a ramshackle shadow of its former glory.Lambah doesn’t believe the buildings owe their dilapidation to any sort of colonial antipathy, citing well-maintained British-era relics like the Bombay High Court and the former Victoria Terminus train station.

A few kilometres away in plush Malabar Hill sits the previously imposing residence of Mohammad Ali Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan and its first governor-general.A Mumbai inter-schools cricket tournament called the Harris Shield is testament to his legacy, but his former home was allowed to come close to collapse before long overdue maintenance work started.According to legend, the hotel went into decline after Indian industrialist Jamsetji Tata built Mumbai’s iconic Taj Mahal Palace because he was denied entry to Watson’s, which had a "Europeans-only" policy. The "Kipling Bungalow", as locals affectionately call it, is one of several mansions in the teeming Indian city, once associated with famous residents but now in ruin.Harris captained England and during his tenure on the subcontinent "did much to lay down foundations for the expansion of the game in India", according to Cricinfo website.Now called Esplanade Mansion, it shows no signs of being restored despite ten years having passed since it was placed on a global list of endangered monuments by the New York-based World Monuments Fund."The Kipling Bungalow is just a very sad reflection of bureaucratic hurdles.Fallen branches, discarded chairs and even empty whisky bottles surround the 19th-century building, while bird droppings mar a bust of Kipling, author of such beloved novels as The Jungle Book and Kim. A lack of funds and arguments between tenants and city authorities have been cited as contributing to its descent into ruin. Jinnah’s house has been embroiled in a long-running legal dispute over ownership between his daughter, India and Pakistan."It was basically falling apart and became too dangerous to be inside," the school’s principal, Mohan Bhogade, said.Watson’s, completed in 1869, is believed to be India’s oldest caste-iron building and was the hotel of choice for colonialists and visiting dignitaries during the British Raj.

It lies empty in thick forest behind a padlocked gate."We feel cheated that such a beautiful monument has been neglected," he adds, pointing to a rotting wooden post, precariously supporting the historic property in south Mumbai.Built in 1882, 17 years after Rudyard was born, the house was home to Lockwood Kipling and subsequent deans until the early 2000s, by which time it had sunk into such disrepair that it was rendered uninhabitable.The gothic building housed school classrooms until four years ago, when pupils were moved out because the crumbling structure had become too weak and hazardous.The wood and stone structure, its green paint peeling, is situated on the grounds of an art school, whose first principal was John Lockwood Kipling, Rudyard’s father.."The idea of heritage has just evaporated," says Naresh Fernandes, author of "City Adrift: A Short Biography of Bombay. "It’s just sheer neglect and bureaucracy," she says.Students gather under the porch of the Kipling Bunglow — the birthplace of author Rudyard Kipling — inside the campus of the J.Nearby stands the former colonial home of Lord Harris, an ex-governor of then-named Bombay, widely credited with making cricket the most popular sport in India..J

Posted by: pretteroduc at 02:28 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 879 words, total size 6 kb.